First Paragraph/Outline

In Archibald MacLeish’s novel, J.B., the main protagonist JB is described in scene one as a loving husband and father, enjoying a lovely meal with his family, all laughing and cheerful. The story of J.B. is a more effective story in order to interpret the message of God compared to the Book of Job because audience members can feel more sympathy for JB’s character due to the was MacLeish creates a loving bond between him and his family, portrays JB emotions more clearly for the audience, and chooses the format of a play so people can feel more emotionally connected with the characters because of their ability to watch the story in person. The Book of Job, although incredibly similar to J.B., is more straight forward and does not integrate human emotions into the story, making it less relatable and doesn’t allow for readers to feel an emotional bond to the story.

Three Sections:

  1. Creating a stronger bond between JB and his family:
    1. Allows the audience to connect more with the family because they can relate it to their own family
    2. The death of the children hurt more because because they will understand JB’s pain if they have children (more so than Job)
    3. JB’s family is more relatable than Job’s because of their lifestyle, Job “owned” his family, JB was a part of his family
  2. JB’s emotions are portrayed more in the story
    1. This makes the story much more relatable with audiences because they would react the same way
    2. JB’s pain would also force them to question God’s actions more
    3. Seeing JB’s pain, but not seeing him reject God is more powerful than not seeing his pain and seeing he didn’t reject God
  3. Choosing the format of a play
    1. Audiences become more connected to characters when they can physically see them
    2. Would be able to see JB’s pain, not just read the description of his pain
    3. Ending scene would be more joyful because audience watches JB get a new family and become happy again (In book of Job, ending is very short and not detailed)

Sources:

  1. MacLeish, Archibald, et al. Archibald Macleish : Reflections. University of Massachusetts Press, 1986. WorldCat
  2. Sanders, Paul S. Twentieth Century Interpretations of the Book of Job : A Collection of Critical Essays. Prentice-Hall, 1968.
  3. French, Warren G. The Fifties: Fiction, Poetry, Drama. Everett/Edwards, 1970.

Essay 2

For my second essay, I want to focus on J.B., by Archibald MacLeish, and how it is a more relatable story compared to the Book of Job. By creating a stronger bond among JB and his family, and by describing JB’s inner emotions more clearly and thoroughly, MacLeish creates a more sympathetic character. Under the circumstances, audiences are more likely to feel more compassion and feel more understanding towards JB’s struggles because of how JB’s relationship with his family is described in such detail. Readers can also see themselves more in the character of JB rather than Job because JB expresses more human emotions, and that resonates more with the audience. By creating this very likable and more easily associable character, readers are able to have more sympathy for JB rather than the more distant character of Job.

Biblical Themes in Pilgrim’s Process

John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Process, is a religious allegory about a good man’s journey through life. Christian’s journey is symbolic of a Catholic man’s struggles to get to Heaven because of the symbolisms behind the names of each character and the destination of the “Celestial City.”

At one point during Christian’s journey in The Pilgrim’s Process, he is traveling with Faithful. The audience can obviously see that Faithful is supposed to represent all Catholic peoples faith in God. However, Envy, Superstition, and Pickthank put Faithful on trial, and sentences Faithful to death. This storyline is a description of how sins can lead people away from their faith in God and completely blind them from the Lord’s will. However, Bunyan provides a small poem in verse 243, that states, “Well, Faithful, thou hast faithfully profest, Unto thy Lord; with whom thou shalt be blest, When faithless ones, with all their vain delights, Are crying out under their hellish plights: Sing, Faithful, sing, and let thy name survive; For though they kill’d thee, thou art yet alive!” So even though Faith was executed, Faith can never truly die because there always will be Hope. In the story, Hopeful comes to replace Faithful and continue to lead Christian to the Celestial City. Naming these characters was a very overt way to symbolize the common struggles of the average Catholic individual, and their struggle to reach Heaven.

Also, Christian’s destination at the end is the Celestial City, which is a symbol of Heaven. Throughout Cristian’s journey, he has to face many hardships, and meet many characters, good and bad. Although at some points he was led astray from his path towards the Celestial City, like when Faithful was killed and he was sent back to jail, he was still always helped along the way by characters such as Hopeful and Faithful. He was always being guided, like how God is supposed to lead us on the path of righteous to Heaven. This is a great religious allegory because it shows how even though Christian was led off the path of salvation by Envy, Superstition, and Pickthank, God will always be there in the form of Hope to guide us back onto the path towards the “Celestial City.” By creating this end game of true holiness, Bunyan is accurately portraying the long and tumultuous path on getting to Heaven.

Spenser’s Epithalamion versus Solomon’s Song of Songs

In both Spenser’s Epithalamion and Solomon’s Song of Songs, each author writes about a wedding. However, both have different purposes. Solomon’s Song of Songs intertwines different types of love poetry, while all Spenser’s Epithalamion is is a poem celebrating a wedding. Spenser’s Epithalamion is a more endearing and personal poem on a wedding, making it more real and relatable because it idolizes the bride, and the author of the poem is the groom.

In Spencer’s Epithalamion, the author praises the bride throughout the entire poem. In the ninth stanza, the author describes her walking down the aisle as, “Clad all in white, that seemes a virgin best. So well it her beseemes that ye would weene, Some angell she had beene.” Giving the bride this type of love and idolization makes this poem more heartwarming for the audience. It gives the readers the real experience of the wedding and allows them to feel more present in the scenario. On the other hand, although the author does praise his bride, it is not throughout the entire poem, and is not as personal of a connection. In the Song of Solomon, the author describes her as, “My love is like a roe or a young hart,” which is not a very detailed or sentimental description. It does not give the audience the same feeling as Epithalamion because it does not create the same bond between bride and groom, only talking about their relationship from a third person perspective. 

Also, the author of the Song of Solomon tells the story from multiple points of view, instead of just one person’s perspective. For example, in chapters seven and eight of Song of Solomon, the author jumps from the perspective among the bride, the groom, and others attending the wedding. This may give the audience a greater perspective on the wedding itself, because we are hearing things that some of the characters don’t know, but this also takes away from the raw, genuine feelings of each character, because we can not focus on just one. In Epithalamion, we hear the perspective of just the groom, who gushes over his new bride, and describes in great detail each event that comes to pass throughout the wedding. This allows the audience to connect more with the groom and appreciate everything that is happening at the wedding. Therefore, Epithalamion gives the audience a more personal experience, making the poem a more real and powerful poem on a wedding compared to the Song of Solomon.

Second Inaugural and Ecclesiasticus 43-50

In Ecclesiasticus, it is evident that the man with the most wisdom is the man who ultimately fears God. Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address is rooted in the ideal that all men are equal and it is shameful to ask God to help keep another human in bondage. Lincoln is able to embody the idea of true wisdom because of his adamant stance against slavery and his complete trust in God’s will.

In his second address, Lincoln states, “It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces; but let us judge not that we be not judged.” Lincoln shows great wisdom by phrasing his opinions in this form because he does not use any harsh or cruel language. He is able to accept the truth that God knows best, so he does not need to aggressively assert his opinion, only the fact that God is in control and does not submit to the will of man. By fighting for the rights of the slaves, his is exemplifying his submission to God because he was still willing to fight for their emancipation even though at the time this was not the most popular and agreeable solution. This act shows true “fear” of God because he is showing himself as submissive to Gods will.

Abraham Lincoln’s act of submission can also be seen as contemporary to Ben Sira, the author of Ecclesiasticus. Sira proved his ultimate wisdom throughout the text he transcribed, describing in detail proper moral instruction and common sense gained from experience. Sira also goes through the history of the ancestors and Patriarchs. By providing instruction on friendship, discipline, how to treat wives/women and children, and giving detail on how the new generation can be saved, Sira did God’s will and showed his ultimate wisdom, by defining it: “the beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord.” This emphasizes the importance of obedience to God and we can see a lot of this obedience in Lincoln’s Second Inaugural. Lincoln states, “Yet, if God wills that [the war] continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether”” Although a very lengthy description, Lincoln purposefully asserts that he will not stop fighting for God’s will ever, which we see in Sira’s writing as well.

Essay 1

Paradise Lost: A More Acceptable Version of Genesis

Paradise Lost gives a recount of Satan appearing to Eve in the garden and appealing to her attractive features in order to get her to eat the forbidden fruit. Although Eve is the first to eat from the Forbidden Tree, Eve is shown as more difficult to convince, while Adam blindly follows along because of his adornment of Eve’s beauty. This represents the average Protestant family dynamic at the time of publication, because men were very dependent on women in relation to maintaining the household and watching the children. In the novel, John Milton creates an alternative story for the Genesis creation story, where gender roles are reversed, Satan is glorified, and God is presented as a more forgiving figure when Adam and Eve ate fruit from the Forbidden Tree. Paradise Lost is a more easily acceptable truth to the average Protestant individual compared to the Bible’s Genesis story because of the more realistic standards and beliefs portrayed in the novel. In the early 1650s, Milton worked for Oliver Cromwell during the Puritan Revolution. During this time, many of the citizens of England, Scotland and Ireland were Puritans who wanted to shred any evidence of Catholicism in their Church. Therefore, when Milton created a different origin story, he used his experience in the the political arena to create a more appealing story for the masses, containing more humanistic features of Adam and Eve, and utilizing ideas that leaned further away from Catholicism.

Gender Roles

In the novel, towards the end of Book 9, Eve easily convinces Adam to eat the apple from the forbidden tree using her sexuality and intelligence against him. In the King James version of the Bible, the verse only references Eve giving Adam the apple without any further detail. The more detailed explanation of how Eve was able to easily get Adam to eat the fruit shows how intelligent Eve was and how Adam was so easily deceived. During this scene, when Eve relays the news about the apple, Adam is horrified. However he quickly begins convincing himself of reasons why he should eat the apple, in order to stay with Eve. For this whole scene, all Eve has to do is patiently ease Adam into eating the apple, using her charm and wit. Although some may interpret this novel as showing women as insubordinates to men because of Adams’ closer relationship with God, a further reading shows Eve as an empowered and strong woman who can use her intelligence in order to prove her superiority above Adam. Audiences can also see how in Erin Shield’s version of Paradise Lost, Eve’s intelligence is even more highlighted than in John Milton’s because Satan is represented as a female character. When Satan convinced Eve to eat from the tree, she does not appeal to her beauty, but her mind and intelligence. Satan says, “It’s a shame really… That Eve’s intelligence should only be appreciated by the lowliest of beasts. Doesn’t she long for greater context?” Utilizing yet another female character in this alternate Genesis story bolden’s Eve’s character even more. This aspect of Eve would appeal to female readers during this time because women were still considered below man and the weaker gender, so a novel highlighting the female intellect resonated with a large audience.

Immediately following the eating of the apple, God knows what they have done and sends his Son to confront Adam. Without reasoning or explaining himself, Adam childishly blames Eve, without taking any responsibility at first. This shows Adams more ignorant side and his foolish manner. This shameful act is not present in the King James version of the Bible, which only cites Adam and Eve praying for forgiveness. Although Adam blames Eve for giving him the fruit, the Son of God gives both Eve and Adam punishments: all women will feel pain during child labor, and all men will be forced to harvest off the Earth for nurishment. This proves equality between the genders, because both man and woman suffer due to the original act of Eve, followed by Adam. The female Puritan audience would positively react to this interpretation because of the revolution, which brought more attention to political matters regarding the female status. Therefore, the more dominant character of Eve alongside the more impulsive version of Adam would be more easily acceptable to the Puritan audience. 

The Puritan audience would also be more accepting of Paradise Lost in comparison to the original Genesis story because Adam and Eve more closely resembled the classic English family. During the late 17th and early 18th century, domestic families would consist of men being the breadwinners of the family, while women would run the household, manage the servants, raise and educate their children, and cook and feed their family. Because of their more prominent role in domestic life, families would put dowries on their daughters in order to find the best spouse for the family. When analyzing the relationship between Adam and Eve, we always see Adam attempting to “chase” Eve, in order to receive her love. In the scene where Eve convinces Adam to eat the apple, Adam is finally convinced because it means that Eve and he will suffer the same doom, even if it causes the fall of mankind. He believes that her love is the reason he should eat the apple, while Eve wants him to eat it so she doesn’t suffer alone. This relationship highlights the control Eve holds compared to Adam, just like how average domestic women hold more major responsibilities in the household compared to men. Audiences can also see Eve as a more modern woman because during the late 17th century, the average domestic housewife during Milton’s time needed to be educated in order to provide for the family. Therefore, Milton’s educated and clever Eve more closely resembled the average female. The King James version of the Bible does not highlight Eve’s sophistication and power in the husband/wife relationship, making it less relatable for readers during the 17th and 18th century compared to Paradise Lost.

Satan is Glorified

Throughout the novel, Paradise Lost, John Milton paints Satan in a very charming and desirable way. Milton is able to capture the reader’s attention and give them someone to root for because he portrays Satan as an “underdog” and as someone people admire. The audience can especially see this in book one, when Satan is sent to hell after losing the battle of the uprising against God. Rising from the flames, Satan still does not repent, and gathers his army with plans of another attack. In many famous films, the protagonist is at first defeated, but then comes back to win everything back, like in Rocky or The Karate Kid. The audience can see the same type of charisma in Satan as one would see in Rocky Balboa and Daniel LaRusso. Audiences are more attracted to these types of stories because they have someone to support and encourage throughout the novel. In Genesis, since Satan is an evil that the audience does not like, and God is all powerful and unbeatable, the reader does not have anyone to root for. While Genesis is more of a history textbook, Paradise Lost is a thrilling origin story that follows the comeback of Satan and his army. Also, during Milton’s time, the Protestant Revolution was occuring. Protestants would have been seen as the “underdog” compared to Catholicism, so when the revolution occured, Protestants could more easily relate themselves to Satan because of their common characteristics. Therefore, when Milton created Satan as a figure worthy of appraisal, he was able to draw in more Protestant readers because they would be able to relate it back to themselves and what was happening at the time.

Not only can the audience view Satan as someone worthy of their support, but as someone with ambition and and passion in what he does. These are the types of characteristics that make someone stand out and make them worthy of success and admiration. Therefore, when Milton presents Satan’s character in this manner, readers would be more interested in this novel compared to Genesis because of the strong, alluring protagonist. In the original Genesis story, the events are written in a more formal tone, just stating the facts, rather than telling a story. This writing style does not give audiences a hero or antihero because it is more centered around what events occurred, rather than who forced these events to occur. Although God is the central figure in Genesis, readers are not attracted to God as a hero because He seems very far away from the story. On the contrary, in Paradise Lost, Satan is a very real and human character that everyone can relate to and be inspired by. For example, when Satan rebels against God and is sent down to Hell, the bible barely touches upon the subject, with merely on line from the book of Isaiah, stating, “How art thou fallen from Heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!” (Isaiah 14:12). However, in Paradise Lost, Milton describes Satan’s rise from the flames, with his fallen army, determination in his eyes, ready to strike again. In comparison, the more compelling text is Milton’s because of the in depth character description and the elongated description of the events that occured throughout Genesis. When Milton utilizes Satan’s more compelling personality, he is able to catch the reader’s attention and draw them into the character. Milton most likely utilizes this method of writing because he had a very complex self-construction. In Barbara K. Lewwalski’s biography on Milton, she explains how “he is concerned with how he sees himself and how he will show himself to others.” This explains why Milton was so involved in creating a different appearance to the classical Satan figure of the time. Because of the Protestant Revolution, Milton was able to successfully create an ambitious and admirable Satan that would attract readers. Therefore, making Satan a more alluring character made Paradise Lost a more interesting read at the time.

Not only did Milton make Satan more attractive by giving him more desirable qualities, but also made Satan a more sexualized figure. This makes Paradise Lost a more attractive read because this Satan is more relatable than the ideal perfectness of God in Genesis. Throughout the novel, Satan is described as a bruting figure, with a very charming personality. When finding Eve in the Garden of Eden, he is able to convince her to eat the apple from the Forbidden Tree by appealing to her beauty and physic. Satan continually calls Eve in book nine “Empress,” or “Queen of this universe,” and appeals to her beauty and intelligence. In Genesis, the line where Satan convinced Eve to eat from the tree was, “Ye shall not surely die, For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened.” (Genesis 3:4-5). This line from Genesis is a lot less complicated because Satan barely had to convince Eve to eat the fruit. It was as though he didn’t even have to try. On the other hand, in Paradise Lost, Satan is a lot more clever and uses his own sexuality and Eve’s sexuality to get her to eat from the tree.  People will be more prone to believing that Eve ate from the tree because she was deceived by a very mysterious and clever character, rather than just being told to eat from the tree and not putting up a fight. This way, the audience can identify with Eve’s mistakes because humans make mistakes and can sometimes be led in the wrong direction. Also, by making Satan more sexualized, Milton is able to allow readers to see more humanity in him. If Satan was just some demon that had no emotions, no one would be able to relate to his character, even if he had ambitions. But giving him a more sexual identity, the audience can visualize him and relate him to themselves. Therefore, by making sexualizing Satan, Milton was able to make Paradise Lost a more easily acceptable truth compared to Genesis because more people could relate to the figure of Satan.

God is Represented as a More Kind and Forgiving Character

In Genesis, God is a very distant character that seems to be very harsh and strict when speaking to Adam and Eve. In Paradise Lost, God is made into a more forgiving and kind figure when dealing with Adam and Eve, especially when they eat from the Forbidden Tree. This more forgiving God in Milton’s novel is more appealing to readers because it gives them a sense of safeness and security because even if you sin, God will always forgive you. In Genesis, when describing how God dealt with Adam and Eve after they ate from the Forbidden Tree, it states, “So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.” (Genesis 3:24). On the other hand, in Milton’s Paradise Lost, God sends Adam and Eve out of the garden, but also reassures them that, although they may have eaten from the Forbidden Tree, there is still possibilities for man and woman to redeem themselves on Earth. This more relaxed approach to a mistake made by humans is more reassuring for the average Protestant individual because the entire Protestant Revolution is based on stripping away the strictness associated with the Catholic church. Therefore, when Milton takes a more open hearted approach to creating God’s character, compared to the distant God in Genesis, he is able to catch the reader’s attention and allow themselves to believe more in the forgiving figure, rather than Genesis, making Paradise Lost a more believable way to write Genesis.

Milton is also able to make Paradise Lost a more acceptable novel compared to Genesis because God seems to be less powerful than Satan. Because Satan represents a more revolutionary figure, people during that time would see Satan as a personification of the Puritan Revolution, and therefore enjoy seeing Satan overpower God. In David Loewenstein’s novel  “Representing Revolution in Milton and His Contemporaries : Religion, Politics, and Polemics in Radical Puritanism,” he states that Milton would “represent the horror of Antichritian rebellion and its proliferating power by using images of the monstrous and unnatural in his prose and poetry.” Therefore, by using Satan, the single being that birthed sin and chaos, in his poem, he was utilizing a monstrous character in order to show his resistance to the Puritan Revolution. However, because the revolution was so popular by the time Paradise Lost was published, Milton made Satan a stronger character so that more people would read his poetry. This choice helped Milton attract more readers and allow for more people to relate to the story. When Adam and Eve are fooled by Satan, od does not rebuke Satan that badly, only making the serpent slither on the ground for the rest of its life. Then, God immediately follows with the fact that although they sinned, they can be redeemed. This makes God look like more of an inferior character because he almost accepts the fact that Satan ruined his ultimate plan for humankind. Therefore, by giving Satan a more prominent role compared to a kind and subtle God, Protestant readers are more attracted to Paradise Lost compared to Genesis.

Also, throughout the novel, God is portrayed as a character who is very closely intertwined with Adam and Eve, while God in Genesis is more of a distanced character. This more closely connected relationship Adam and Eve in Paradise Lost attracts more readers because more Protestant readers are attracted to a more personal relationship with God compared to having to go to church every Sunday and paying indulgences to have a close relationship with God. For example, in Book 8, when describing his coming about, Adam remembers waking up in the sunlight, and first seeing God before anything else. This shows how close their bond is because of their immediate connection when Adam arises. On the other hand, in Genesis, Adam’s creation is barely described in detail, just mentioned in passing, making it less of a strong connection between Adam and God. Therefore, the more kind and closely connected God in Paradise Lost is a more acceptable truth compared to the story of Genesis.

To conclude, John Milton’s Paradise Lost is a more believable and popular interpretation of Genesis during Milton’s time because of more empowerment in the character of Eve, the glorification of Satan, and and I more loving and forgiving God figure. Throughout the novel, Eve is shown as a more clever and knowledgeable female character, attracting female audiences during Milton’s time. By creating a glorified Satan, Protestant audiences can see him as a more attractive character, and can see him as a personification of the Puritan Revolution. Also, by creating a more loving a forgiving God, many readers are more attracted to the representation of a less strict and harsh, punishing God. Therefore, Milton’s Paradise Lost is a more acceptable truth compared to the Bible’s Genesis story because audiences during the time of publication would prefer the choices Milton made throughout his novel.   

First Section of Essay

Paradise Lost gives a recount of Satan appearing to Eve in the garden and appealing to her attractive features in order to get her to eat the forbidden fruit. Although Eve is difficult to deceive, Adam easily follows along after Eve. In the novel, John Milton creates an alternative story for the Genesis creation story, where gender roles are reversed, Satan is sexualized, and God is presented as a more forgiving figure when Adam and Eve ate fruit from the forbidden tree. Paradise Lost is a more easily acceptable truth to the average Protestant individual compared to the Bible’s Genesis story because of the more realistic standards and beliefs portrayed in the novel. In the early 1650s, Milton worked for Oliver Cromwell during the Puritan Revolution. During this time, many of the citizens of England, Scotland and Ireland were Puritans who wanted to shred any evidence of Catholicism in their Church. Therefore, when Milton created a different origin story, he used his experience in the the political arena to create a more appealing story for the masses, containing more humanistic features of Adam and Eve, and utilizing ideas that leaned further away from Catholicism.

Gender Roles

In the novel, towards the end of Book 9, Eve easily convinces Adam to eat the apple from the forbidden tree using her sexuality and intelligence against him. In the King James version of the Bible, the verse only references Eve giving Adam the apple without any further detail. The more detailed explanation of how Eve was able to easily get Adam to eat the fruit shows how intelligent Eve was and how Adam was so easily deceived. During this scene, when Eve relays the news about the apple, Adam is horrified. However he quickly begins convincing himself of reasons why he should eat the apple, in order to stay with Eve. For this whole scene, all Eve has to do is patiently ease Adam into eating the apple, using her charm and wit. Although some may interpret this novel as showing women as insubordinates to men because of Adams’ closer relationship with God, a further reading shows Eve as an empowered and strong woman who can use her intelligence in order to prove her superiority above Adam. Audiences can also see how in Erin Shield’s version of Paradise Lost, Eve’s intelligence is even more highlighted than in John Milton’s because Satan is represented as a female character. When Satan convinced Eve to eat from the tree, she does not appeal to her beauty, but her mind and intelligence. Satan says, “It’s a shame really… That Eve’s intelligence should only be appreciated by the lowliest of beasts. Doesn’t she long for greater context?” Utilizing yet another female character in this alternate Genesis story bolden’s Eve’s character even more. This aspect of Eve would appeal to female readers during this time because women were still considered below man and the weaker gender, so a novel highlighting the female intellect resonated with a large audience.

Immediately following the eating of the apple, God knows what they have done and sends his Son to confront Adam. Without reasoning or explaining himself, Adam childishly blames Eve, without taking any responsibility at first. This shows Adams more ignorant side and his foolish manner. This shameful act is not present in the King James version of the Bible, which only cites Adam and Eve praying for forgiveness. Although Adam blames Eve for giving him the fruit, the Son of God gives both Eve and Adam punishments: all women will feel pain during child labor, and all men will be forced to harvest off the Earth for nurishment. This proves equality between the genders, because both man and woman suffer due to the original act of Eve, followed by Adam. The female Puritan audience would positively react to this interpretation because of the revolution, which brought more attention to political matters regarding the female status. Therefore, the more dominant character of Eve alongside the more impulsive version of Adam would be more easily acceptable to the Puritan audience. 

The Puritan audience would also be more accepting of Paradise Lost in comparison to the original Genesis story because Adam and Eve more closely resembled the classic English family. During the late 17th and early 18th century, domestic families would consist of men being the breadwinners of the family, while women would run the household, manage the servants, raise and educate their children, and cook and feed their family. Because of their more prominent role in domestic life, families would put dowries on their daughters in order to find the best spouse for the family. When analyzing the relationship between Adam and Eve, we always see Adam attempting to “chase” Eve, in order to receive her love. In the scene where Eve convinces Adam to eat the apple, Adam is finally convinced because it means that Eve and he will suffer the same doom, even if it causes the fall of mankind. He believes that her love is the reason he should eat the apple, while Eve wants him to eat it so she doesn’t suffer alone. This relationship highlights the control Eve holds compared to Adam, just like how average domestic women hold more major responsibilities in the household compared to men. Audiences can also see Eve as a more modern woman because during the late 17th century, the average domestic housewife during Milton’s time needed to be educated in order to provide for the family. Therefore, Milton’s educated and clever Eve more closely resembled the average female. The King James version of the Bible does not highlight Eve’s sophistication and power in the husband/wife relationship, making it less relatable for readers during the 17th and 18th century compared to Paradise Lost.

Essay 1

In the novel Paradise Lost, John Milton creates an alternative story for the Genesis creation story, where gender roles are reversed, Satan is sexualized, and God is presented as a more forgiving figure when Adam and Eve ate fruit from the forbidden tree. Because of the more realistic standards and beliefs portrayed in the novel, Paradise Lost is a more easily acceptable truth compared to the Bible’s Genesis.

  • First section: Gender Roles
    • Eve is portrayed as a more sophisticated and dependable character
    • Adam has more of a almost “goofy” way about him, in the sense that he does not appear as a well rounded and intelligent male figure
  • Satan is sexualized
    • Satan appears to be more of an “underdog,” or someone who the audience roots for
    • Satan is shown as a character with drive and passion, which many people see as appealing traits
  • God is a more forgiving character
    • When Adam and Eve ate from the forbidden tree, instead of the taking the more strict, reprimanding figure, as shown in Genesis, God is shown as more of a forgiving figure
    • God explains that although they made a mistake, human kind can redeem themselves
  • Passages in Paradise Lost:
    • Book 1- “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
    • Book 6- Adam rants about his admiration of his appearance to Rafael, although Eve is the one shown as the vain character initially
    • Book 9- Eve is convinced by Satan to eat the apple, but convinces Adam very quickly using her feminine charm
    • Book 10- Adam immediately blames Eve for the fact that they ate the apple
    • Book 11- God hears Adam and Eves prayers and plans on allowing human kind to redeem themselves
  • Sources:
    • Shields, Erin, and John Milton. Paradise Lost. First edition., First ed., Playwrights Canada Press, 2018. INSERT-MISSING-DATABASE-NAME, public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5840976. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
    • Loewenstein, David. Milton : Paradise Lost. 2nd ed., 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2004. INSERT-MISSING-DATABASE-NAME, INSERT-MISSING-URL. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
    • Gardner, Helen. A Reading of Paradise Lost. Clarendon Press, 1965.

King’s readings and St. Athanasius 31-40

In the readings for King’s book one and two, false prophets were harshly persecuted for denying that the Lord was the one and only true God. Because of the severity of the punishments given to the false prophets, the audience is able to see why St. Athanasius stresses the importance of praying away the false fortune tellers and prophets.

In chapter’s 31-35, St. Athanasius provides several different scenarios where the devil may attempt to lead those with weakened faith towards false beliefs and away from God’s good graces. At some point, the audience may see this repetition of the same lesson redundant, but after reading Kings, it is easy to see why this is such an important lesson. In Kings book one verse 18:40, Elijah slays all the false prophets of Baal after proving that their god was not a real god, and they were spreading false words that attempted to steer followers away from the Lord. The manner in which the prophets were slain was very harsh and revealing of God’s vengeance. Therefore, in chapter 32 when St. Athanasius stresses the importance of praying away false fortune tellers, the audience can understand why he chooses to expand so widely on the idea of only believing God as the holder of the future. When I first read the chapter, I immediately thought of a weatherman and was confused on why St. Athanasius would so harshly speak against those who attempted to know the weather in the future. However, when using the information from King’s book one, it is obvious why this would be such an important lesson.

Another example of false prophets being persecuted is in Kings book one verse 20:36. In this verse, the man refused to spite the son of the prophets in the name of the Lord. Therefore, the man was slain by a lion. This cruelty seems very unnecessary to me because the man was asked to smite someone, and refusing almost seemed like the better option. However, this is only a lesson that is told in order to illustrate how followers of the Lord must obey His orders, no matter what, because God has His followers best intentions in mind, even if it may not seem like it at first. We see this reflected in St. Athanasius’ writings in chapter 40. Instead of listening to Satan’s temptations, especially in a time of weakness, St. Athanasius chose to pray and follow the word of God, and every time Satan would leave out of fear of the word of God. This story of his own personal struggle portrays the lessons taught in Kings and further explains God’s intentions.

Exodus 1-4 and “The Ten Commandments”

In both Exodus and the movie “The Ten Commandments,” God’s power is depicted as something that should be feared rather than admired. Instead of reveling in His power, the masses are shown fearful of His might. Therefore, the audience can conclude that we are not truly shown God’s love until He gives Moses the Ten Commandments.

In the book of Exodus, when discusses God’s power, many People describe it as something to be fearful of. During the time of the enslavement of the people of Israel, when the Pharaoh tells all the handmaids to kill their child if it is born a boy, they choose not to because the “midwives feared God” (Exodus 1:17). Although the midwives fear God, He did treat them well for keeping the children born male alive. However, we are shown in Exodus 4:14 that God can be perceived as fearful, stating “And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Moses.” In every CCD class I attended, God was always described as all loving and all kind. Therefore, it was quite odd reading Exodus and seeing God painted as a feared leader. A reasonable explanation for why God might have seemed fearful at the time is because the Pharaoh was also seen as a godly figure, and people may have just confused their fear of the Pharaoh’s wrath with a fear of God himself. However, we can see a shift in language after Moses received the Ten Commandments. Because the people were given freedom and true structure, they are able to see all the good God has done for them.

We also see this resemblance in the film “The Ten Commandments.” At minute 3:13, we see the Pharaoh depicted as almost sympathetic because his first and only son died by the wrath of God. Not only do we feel sorrow for the Pharaoh, but the entire scene where Moses sits with family throughout the night, hearing the screams of mothers losing their first child, is gruesome. The Holy Spirit looks haunting as it covers the entire sky over the town (3:03). However, after the night is complete, we see the people of Israel rejoice after finally being allowed to evacuate Egypt and find the Holy Land. But unfortunately, the people of Israel still feared the Lord’s power and could not fully accept Him. Not until Moses delivered the Ten Commandments were the people of Israel fully true to the Lord’s word. After the revealing of the Ten Commandments, the audience is shown a turning point within the people of Israel. Everyone was finally able to rejoice in the word of God, without feeling fear.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started